Board logo

標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru? [打印本頁]

作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-25 10:35 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:01 PM 編輯

今日我在LEO左手發現左一粒可能就是Nibiru的棕矮星
它目前的位置在9h 47m 57.0s 13º 16' 45.5"

只有在紅外線模式下才能出現的巨型星體"影子"


在沒有紅外線模式下係完全見唔到的

它的位置就在獅子座的左手手臂上, 24th Feb 2009


Sky map of the LEO


Pictures were captured by Looseman on 24th Feb 2009 @ Google Sky
如有天文人o係到發現有錯處可以作出任何correction, 3q
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-25 10:37 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:02 PM 編輯

更多有關的info.
What is a 棕矮星
棕矮星(Brown dwarf)是類恆星天體的一種,它們是所謂「失敗的恆星」,與一般恆星不同,棕矮星由於質量不足,不能像正常恆星那樣通過氫核聚變維持光度,無法成為主序星。但它們的內部及表面均呈對流狀態,不同的化學物質並不會在內部分層存在。研究表明,小於13倍木星質量的天體不會發生氘核聚變,而大於75倍木星質量的天體會產生氫核聚變[1],因此如果只從質量上區分,棕矮星為處於13倍木星質量與75倍木星質量之間的天體。現時人們仍在研究棕矮星在過往是否曾經在某位置發生過核聚變,已知的是,質量大於13個木星的棕矮星可融合氘。棕矮星的許多性質與太陽系外巨行星(EGP)相似,因此也有人將它們統稱為具有亞恆星質量的天體(SMO)。
歷史
1960年代天文學家們已經在理論上都預測了棕矮星的存在[2][3]。棕矮星原先被稱為「黑矮星」,代表在字宙間漂浮的類恆星天體或質量不足以發生核反應的天體。但「黑矮星」一詞現時是指一些停止發光,並已死亡的白矮星。
早期的恆星模型指出,一個天體欲成為真恆星,必須擁有80個以上的木星質量,以產生核反應。「棕矮星」的理論最初於1960年代早期提出,指其數量可能比真恆星多,由於未能發光,要尋找也頗為困難。它們會釋出紅外線,可憑地面的紅外線偵測器來偵測,但由提出至證實發現足足用了數十年。
近期的研究則指出,恆星能發光發熱除取決於質量外,也包括其內含的化合物。一些棕矮星的質量達到90個木星仍不能點燃內部的氫。還有當一團星雲塌縮時,除產生恆星外,也會產生不發光的棕矮星,其質量少於13個木星。
首個棕矮星於1995年得到證實,到2006年已經發現了三百多顆,並在1999年發現了第一個雙棕矮星系統[4],軌道周期約為6天。棕矮星被認為是銀河系中數目最多的天體之一,較接近地球的棕矮星是印第安座υ星,該恆星系統擁有兩顆棕矮星,距離太陽12光年。
棕矮星的形成
關於棕矮星形成的機制天文學家們眾說紛紜,比較常見的有拋射理論、前恆星核的光致侵蝕理論、不透明度制約的分裂理論、原恆星盤的不穩定性理論等。拋射理論認為,棕矮星是由於低質量的原恆星胚在還沒有達到產生氫核聚變所需的質量前,與其它天體發生了碰撞而被拋射出前恆星核所形成的[5][6],這一理論部分地得到了雙棕矮星系統的證實。前恆星核的光致侵蝕理論基於大質量恆星的輻射對前恆星核的光致侵蝕作用,能夠解釋處於電離氫區中的棕矮星的形成機制。棕矮星也可能由大質量的原恆星盤在其它恆星的引力作用下發生碎裂而產生[7]。這些理論每個都只能解釋部分棕矮星的形成,研究棕矮星周圍的恆星盤可以有效地檢驗上述理論。
wiki
http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E6%A3%95%E7%9F%AE%E6%98%9F&variant=zh-hk
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-25 10:38 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:02 PM 編輯

更多有關的info.

2008年日本神戶大學prof.也發現了它?
Planet Projected at Solar System's Edge
Kyoko Hasegawa, AFP
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2008/02/28/planet-solar-system.html
Feb. 28, 2008 -- Scientists at a Japanese university said Thursday they believed another planet up to two-thirds the size of the Earth was orbiting in the far reaches of the solar system.
The researchers at Kobe University in western Japan said calculations using computer simulations led them to conclude it was only a matter of time before the mysterious "Planet X" was found.
"Because of the very cold temperature, its surface would be covered with ice, icy ammonia and methane," Kobe University professor Tadashi Mukai, the lead researcher, told AFP.
The study by Mukai and researcher Patryk Lykawka will be published in the April issue of the Astronomical Journal.
"The possibility is high that a yet unknown, planet-class celestial body, measuring 30 percent to 70 percent of the Earth's mass, exists in the outer edges of the solar system," said a summary of the research released by Kobe University.
"If research is conducted on a wide scale, the planet is likely to be discovered in less than 10 years," it said.
Planet X--so called by scientists as it is yet unfound--would have an oblong elliptical solar orbit and circle the sun every thousand years, the team said, estimating its radius was 15 to 26 billion kilometers.
The study comes two years after school textbooks had to be rewritten when Pluto was booted out of the list of planets.
Pluto was discovered by the American astronomer Clyde Tombaugh in 1930 in the so-called Kuiper belt, a chain of icy debris in the outer reaches of the solar system.
In 2006, nearly a decade after Tombaugh's death, the International Astronomical Union ruled the celestial body was merely a dwarf planet in the cluttered Kuiper belt.
The astronomers said Pluto's oblong orbit overlapped with that of Neptune, excluding it from being a planet. It defined the solar system as consisting solely of the classical set of Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.
The team noted that more than 1,100 celestial bodies have been found in the outer reaches of the solar system since the mid-1990s.
"But it would be the first time to discover a celestial body of this size, which is much larger than Pluto," Mukai said.
The researchers set up a theoretical model looking at how the remote area of the solar system would have evolved over the past four billion years.
"In coming up with an explanation for the celestial bodies, we thought it would be most natural to assume the existence of a yet unknown planet," Mukai said.
"Based on our hypothesis, we calculated how debris moved over the past four billion years. The result matched the actual movement of the celestial bodies we can observe now," he said.
He was hopeful about research by Kobe University, the University of Hawaii and Taiwan's National Central University.
"We are expecting that the ongoing joint celestial observation project will eventually discover Planet X," Mukai said.

作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-25 10:41 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:03 PM 編輯

十個太陽的event?? 有無可能呀?
由於月球很細所以能反光也很少, 但月球在近水平上升時有時看上去也像一個小太陽, 這是角度問題
當planet-x近地球時因為面積巨大能反光也強很多, 它本身可能都有自己的月亮, 所以可能看上去會唔只兩個太陽
估一下, 如果它們的position係咁嘅時侯
太陽 > 地球 > Planet-X
到時地球可能真的會有一段時間沒有夜晚的
重有Planet-X話係差唔多以經死亡的星所以沒有光, 沒有很多星體像太陽一様.
要等它近太陽系時才能用紅外線望遠鏡望到小許"黑影"
夠景有冇Planet-X我地好快就會知, 唔需要爭論有定冇.
NASA的可信度?
NASA has been reported in 2003年  遍號#2003UB313
有關的書
The Dark Star:
The Planet X Evidence
© Timeless Voyager Press 2005
ISBN number 1-892264-18-8


Author Andy LloydAndy Lloyd's work on the subject of Nibiru has become essential reading for anyone who has studied the theories of Zecharia Sitchin.  After 6 years of research, the Dark Star Theory is finally available in book format, available through all good book shops. 'The Dark Star' is 328 pages long, is beautifully illustrated and fully referenced.  An awful lot of work has gone into the book.  Its purpose is to establish the facts about Planet X in a clear and understandable way.
At the end of this book, your understanding and appreciation of the outer solar system will be greatly enhanced.  You will have the facts at your fingertips when discussing the potential existence of Planet X.  You will know WHY this object is for real, and why that is so significant for us all.
The feedback I have received about the book makes the following point very clear:  That complex scientific material has been presented in a way that was easily readable, and enjoyable.

The book will stretch your mind to possibilities you have never considered!
Nibiruan Symbols (Nibiru人的古代象徵--LEO)
這粒Brown Dwarf係幾千年前以經出現過,
它的特點係非常地match Nibiru的,
從地球看上去的太空只有哩粒是這様, 它好可能就係Nibiru

↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓↓



In Darkstar16 I looked at the depiction of Leo at Nimrud Dag in Turkey, and analysed the celestial positions of the stars on the frieze.  It quickly became evident that the star shown within the upturned crescent moon could not be Regulus, as had previously been assumed.  Instead, the placement of a star within a crescent presented us with a new possibility, that of the projected arrival of Nibiru in Leo.  The positioning of the other planets in the constellation allowed us to date this event to 2BC.  What was unclear was whether this frieze was designed to predict an event, or to record one.  Given the construction of a 'star shaft' at a different point in the mountain (1), it seemed likely that this Anatolian complex, dating back to about 60BC, was aimed at pinpointing the date of a future event.
That event, I proposed, was the expected appearance of Nibiru, a brown dwarf in an elongated elliptical orbit around the Sun, that was one and the same as the Messianic Star.

作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-25 11:01 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:03 PM 編輯

Youtube.com videos:
NIBRUI PLANET X HERES NASA,S PROOF
有關馬雅2012, 聖經...,etc. 的一些關系
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAnUDjZ5QDE
Nibiru home of the original humans?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACsGCTfiEu0
2012: Deadly Polar Shift Cataclysm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ahoPGzL50Q
作者: JammyLee    時間: 2009-2-26 06:57 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

有一個問題﹕
為何要用紅外線才能看到﹖
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-26 12:13 PM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:03 PM 編輯

這是鹿林彗星(Comet Lulin)
我估會有唔少人話我上面的就是鹿林, 自己比一下吧





彗星係唔需要用紅外缐模式下才能見到
紅外線模式下先可見到棕矮星
彗星只需普通光學模式
彗星size很小, 速度快
這個棕矮星可有2/3~1/2個地球咁大
重有它不是Jupiter
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-26 12:20 PM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:04 PM 編輯

the answer is here
早期的恆星模型指出,一個天體欲成為真恆星,必須擁有80個以上的木星質量,以產生核反應。「棕矮星」的理論最初於1960年代早期提出,指其數量可能比真恆星多,由於未能發光,要尋找也頗為困難。它們會釋出紅外線,可憑地面的紅外線偵測器來偵測,但由提出至證實發現足足用了數十年。

作者: JammyLee    時間: 2009-2-26 06:59 PM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

下面引用由looseman2009/02/25 01:20pm 發表的內容:
the answer is here
Thanks
這顆疑似棕矮星﹐閤下還能看到他嗎﹖
(抱歉﹐本人並不懂甚麼天文。問的問題可能有點白痴...)
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-27 05:49 PM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 10:04 PM 編輯

我沒有那麼高級器材...我估民用的大茼都未必見到
現在還未進入太陽系, 當近太陽時人人肉眼可見, 從地球南部先
給你兩條links

google sky
http://www.google.com/sky/#latitude=13.239945499286312&longitude=-33.28857421875&zoom=7&Spitzer=0.00&ChandraXO=0.00&Galex=0.00&IRAS=100.00&WMAP=0.00&Cassini=0.00&slide=1&mI=-1&oI=-1

sky-map.org
http://www.sky-map.org/?ra=12.48&de=12.419999999999996&zoom=5&show_grid=1&show_constellation_lines=1&show_constellation_boundaries=1&show_const_names=0&show_galaxies=1&img_source=SDSS

也可以DL WorldWide Telescope from M$ http://www.worldwidetelescope.org/Home.aspx


Ra 9 47 59 Dec 13 16 27 Hit these coordinates and zoom in and You will see it just below the Solar ecliptic Line
there have stars "USNOA2 0975-06336061 & TYC 834-138-1" are near the position, don't bother with them
must be in "infrared sky survey" mode in order to see it
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-27 05:51 PM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 09:58 PM 編輯

1 more capture added


作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-28 07:05 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 09:58 PM 編輯

以現代天文係沒有它的存在, 所以只能找古老的sources加上現今可找到的資料去印證,
下面的文可以解答大多人的問題
我找也找不到有任何中文能有這樣認真去講..有時間的話或許我會做中文的translation
由於Nibiru係一粒Brown Dwarf,
大部份天文愛好者都不易見到它所以也有很多人認為它只是"吹水"...主流思想主道下Government唔出聲=冇?

http://www.newsfinder.org/site/more/nibiru_the_12th_planet/
Nibiru - The 12th Planet
Posted by Arthur Sigurssen          Posted by Arthur Sigurssen in Strange World section

Nibiru Symbol
In the 1980's astronomers were searching for a 10th planet in our solarsystem, one that explained the perturbations of our outer planets,Uranus and Neptune. (Check out the news items ). The planet wasdiscovered, but since then we have heard nothing more about Planet X.Why has the discovery not been publicised since then?
A book called The 12th Planet written in 1976 by Zechariah Sitchintells of the ancient Sumerian legends of a planet with a comet-likeorbit that came into our area of the solar system every 3600 years. Theinhabitants of this planet were like gods to the earth natives. Theyshuttled from their planet to earth with rockets and mined gold to takeback to their home planet, Nibiru. He contends they were the ones theBible in Genesis refers to as the Nefilim, and as giants.
Could this same Planet X or 12th Planet be the source of the many mythsand legends that describe comets as portents of doom, and speak ofbattling planets? Could it be the cause of the periodic destruction'sof great civilisations of the past by earthquakes, volcanoes, tidalwaves, as described in many ancient texts, including the Bible, and byVelikovsky? Does Planet X cause a pole shift on earth as it passes by?
The Myth
Nibiru is the 4th dimensional flagship of the Milky Way Galaxy’sGalactic Federation. Many different civilisations have representativesthat live aboard it. It is a planet, a battlestar, and a ship, all atthe same time. It was the main peacekeeping force in the galaxy until2000 BC, and is a little over 3 times the size of Earth.
Nibiru’s symbol is the 8 pointed star. It is very bright due to thegold dust suspended in its atmosphere. It used to travel in the 5thdimension, but that changed when Marduk, grandson of Anu (the Pleiadeanruler of Nibiru) overthrew his grandfather and took command of thebattlestar flagship. As a result of this turn of events, members of thehigher councils of the Nibiruan Council decided to limit Nibiru’sability to use stargates. Now Nibiru only has access to stargates inthe 4th dimension.
The Facts
Geologists, not recognising the periodic cataclysmic nature of ourplanet, look at ancient fossils and calculate they are millions ofyears old. That is only because they calculate the cataclysmic eventsas required to take millions of years to happen. Once they recognisethat these events could have occurred suddenly, in a matter of days,their historical timelines will be drastically altered.
After seeing the Comet Shoemaker-Levy crash into the planet Jupiter afew years ago, astronomers now realise the possibility of asteroids andcomets similarly affecting earth.
Their most recent discoveries of planets circling other stars, planetswith elliptical orbits, circling two stars, “rogue” planets, methane“brown-dwarf” planets, are all proof that no matter how certain scienceis one day that something is silly and impossible, they can be provenquite wrong the next. The best scientists are, therefore, not thehardened sceptics, but those who continually keep an open mind.
In January 1981 several daily newspapers stated that Pluto’s orbitindicates that Planet X exists. The report stated that an astronomerfrom the U.S Naval Observatory told a meeting of the AmericanAstronomical Society that irregularities in the orbit of Plutoindicates that the solar system contains a 10th planet. He also notedthat this came to no surprise to Zecharia Sitchin, whose book aboutthis planet came out three years prior.
In 1982 NASA themselves officially recognised the possibility of PlanetX, with an announcement that an object is really there - far beyond theoutermost planets.
One year later in 1983 the newly launched IRAS (Infrared AstronomicalSatellite) quickly found Planet X (the 10th). The Washington Postsummary of an with the chief IRAS scientist from JPL California hadthese words to say, a heavenly body as large as Jupiter (The size beingin perfect parallel to the ancients knowledge) and part of this solarsystem has been found in the direction of the constellation of Orion byan orbiting telescope. The orbiting telescope found it right where itwas sent to look. They had known of it’s existence an location foryears but wanted to confirm it with our own technological eyes. Theseare facts I strongly urge you to check out for yourself. There havebeen attempts to cover-up this event and rewrite history.
Perhaps Nibiru is not a planet at all, but a small system consisting ofa Brown Dwarf Star and a small accompanying planet. Brown dwarfs were,until recently, only theoretical planet/star hybrids. Astronomersbelieve that they have now located some brown dwarfs, whose luminosityis so low as to make their detection extremely difficult. Essentially,they are the product of an accreting gas cloud that is several timesmore massive than that which eventually made Jupiter. Beyond a certainthreshold of mass, reactions within this world lead to the emission ofheat and a minute amount of light, but the body is still too small toset off the thermonuclear chain reactions that ignite a conventionalstar. They appear a dull red, contrary to the colour that their namewould suggest, and do not increase beyond the spherical dimensions ofJupiter, despite having a greater mass.
作者: looseman    時間: 2009-2-28 07:07 AM     標題: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 looseman 於 2009-11-9 09:58 PM 編輯

They are thought to be relatively commonplace in the Universe, andtheir relative lack of appearances thus far reflect their dark starqualities. If one is in orbit around the Sun, then it is quiteplausible that its detection by telescope has not yet occurred, so onecan understand the paucity of tangible data from further afield. But aswe become more able to detect and observe planets around other stars,so will our ability to observe this maverick in our own system increase.
The sensational aspect of all this is when one starts to consider thisworld as a very dim star, rather than a planet. The implication is thatwe are in a binary star system! Of course, the brown dwarf alluded tois not a star in the conventional sense, but it may emit enough lightand heat to make possible moons around it life supporting. Consideringits distance from the Sun in the extreme cold of the void, thatpossibility is an exciting one. It is certainly the case that anyterrestrial planet that far from the Sun would not be able to supportlife on its own.
So, what if this Brown Dwarf in fact had planets circling in closeproximity around it. Surely this would better explain the presence oflife. After all, the Nibiruans are supposed to have lived on the Earthand then fled to their home planet which takes it on a 3600 year orbitout of the known solar system. If that was the case, and it was just aplanet and not an actual Brown Dwarf/Planetary system, how could lifebe sustained in the far reaches of our Solar System. The Brown Dwargtheory makes much more sense and has a correlation with the HopiProphicies. When an object in space is moving towards the observer it’scolour changes by means of the Doppler effect. This is effectivelywhere the light waves are “squashed” together and shift towards adifferent light spectrum. When the object is moving towards theobserver at high speed it turns blue. The Hopi prophecies quite clearlyrefer to the Blue Star that shines in the heavens
Newton’s law of gravity is insufficient to explain planetary science.Planets are magnetic objects and also have a repulsion force thatcreates the balance between them and keeps them moving. The momentumtheory for planets is positively ridiculous. What we call modernastronomical and planetary science is still very much in the dark agesbecause of this. Play with two magnets to find out that if both areturned a certain way it’s difficult to get them to touch because of therepulsion force. The exclusion of the repulsion force in planetaryscience is a gigantic flaw and political embarrassment to any who’vebeen involved. The story of the Emperor with no clothes is a perfectanalogy for how it’s being dealt with.
The earth’s 30 miles thick crust acts as a magnetic shield, hiding thetrue magnetic relationships between planets from our terrestrialscientific instruments. If you want to begin to understand the workingsof the solar system you would do better just to eat a Fig Newton cookiethan to read Newton’s law of gravity that does not take into accountthe repulsion force. The most interesting scientific revelations offplanet that are discovered are generally kept quite from the publicunder the guise of military security reasons by the financialcontrollers of these institutions who are pulling the puppet strings.
Historic records
History records many names for Planet X. The Sumerian’s called it the12th planet or Nibiru (translates into; planet of passing). TheBabylonians and Mesopotamians called it Marduk, The King of The Heavensand The Great Heavenly Body. The ancient Hebrews referred to it as theWinged Globe because of it’s long orbit high among the stars. TheGreeks called it Nemesis. (its most telling name) Prophets have namedit The Blue Star, The Red Star, The Fiery Messenger, and The Comet ofDoom among others. No matter what the name used, it’s the same objectthat has the same effects before and during it’s passage of earth. TheSumerians also had a name for it’s approximate 3600 year orbit (AShar). The ancient Hindu astronomers named Treta Yuga (3600 years) andthe destruction it causes Kali Yuga.
Look to Discovering Archaeology, July/August 1999, on page 72. The date1628 BCE is given for a world wide catastrophic event. Approximately3600 years ago and coinciding with its return at this time. Page 70shows a medieval picture with a large comet looking object as big asthe sun streaking across the sky horizontally with a giant tail. Belowis a town that is shaking apart with hysterical people in the streets.
Its elliptical orbit takes it around two suns. The other sun it orbitsis our suns dark twin. Nibiru’s inbound approach is being closelymonitored by our best telescopic equipment on and off earth. This isone of many reasons the orbiting Hubble telescope live feed is hiddenfrom our view. The most accurate calculation for Planet X’s nextpassage is now late May or June 2003.
Each time it approaches it starts a chain of events that culminateswith it passing by and causing our earth’s surface to change. Thesechanges are the cause of massive death and destruction. History is richwith these stories. Many people from the past didn’t draw theconnection between what looked to be a large comet overhead and whatthey were experiencing at the time (volcanoes erupting, earthquakes,land masses sinking and rising, tidal waves, severe weather andfloods). Some of these writers from the distant past simply noted whatthey thought was a foreboding sign or messenger of the prophets,instead of the cause for their woes.
Events
In 1995 Planet X became close enough to us that its magnetism startedto effect earth in a big way, which increases now daily. The closer itgets to us the faster it moves toward earth and the stronger itsmagnetic effects become. There is an ebb and flow to these events thatare akin to the calm waves before the next big set. Surfers would bemost familiar with this analogy. Expect things to get worse as itapproaches nearer but not in a straight line.
Our own sun’s gravity is what is pulling it closer and faster. Planet Xis not going to hit earth or the sun because of the repulsion forcewhich comes into play as they near each other. There is still reason tobe forewarned and concerned.
Earth now has two strong magnetic influences in the vicinity (our sunbeing the main one) and its core is heating up because of it. It’s likea car with the accelerator and brake on at the same time. The sun ispushing and pulling on earth one way and Planet X is now upsetting thatbalance with its own set of influences. This has been the reason forall the strange weather and seismic activity as of late.
With correct scientific and historical information you don’t need to bea prophet to predict the same cycle of events are happening againduring Planet X’s approach. These events are just a minor taste of whatwill come when it goes by this time. And yet even these relativelyminor events can cause much destruction. Many areas of the world willbegin to be severely effected even before the date of passing in 2003,so don’t think you can wait to the last minute and then jet awaysafely!!
作者: 守缺    時間: 2009-3-16 03:17 PM     標題: RE: 信唔信它就係Nibiru?

本帖最後由 守缺 於 2009-3-16 07:19 AM 編輯

looseman 兄搜來這許多資料真是辛苦了。

太陽其實不太可能有一顆伴星的,因爲伴星的引力作用相當明顯,可以直接測量出來。即使那只是一顆棕矮星,那重量也夠大了。

如果說 Nibiru 是一顆行星,本來也無大問題,但這顆行星的軌道亦不應該跨越現有行星的軌道。要知道現有的行星幾乎都擁有接近完美的圓形軌道,而這是在一個極少干擾的環境下才會出現的現象。如果有一顆 Nibiru 每隔一段時間就沖進來亂搞一次,我們現在的太陽系也不會如此秩序井然了。

Nibiru 如果以大致圓形的軌道遠遠的在太陽系外圍晃著,那倒沒有矛盾,但跟傳説又不接榫了。




歡迎光臨 Cyber X-files (http://www.cyberxfiles.com/cyberx/) Powered by Discuz! 7.0.0